Sign up for news about books, authors, and more from Penguin Random House, Visit other sites in the Penguin Random House Network. This is the problem. To the Editors. guilty for failing to protest Hitler's murderous intentions and policies while there was still time, and for this, they should be ashamed. Most Germans considered Jews to be parasites and not even human. [93] In 2011, in an apparent reference to Hitler's Willing Executioners, the American columnist Jeffrey Goldberg wrote the leaders of the Islamic Republic of Iran were all "eliminationist anti-Semites". The anti-Christ of history - a truly shocking effort by a misleading author. Hitler's Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust (1996) is a book by American writer Daniel Goldhagen that argues that the vast majority of ordinary Germans were as the title indicates "willing executioners" in the Holocaust because of a unique and virulent " eliminationist antisemitism" in the German political culture, which had [34], What some commentators termed "The Goldhagen Affair"[35] began in late 1996, when Goldhagen visited Berlin to participate in the debate on television and in lecture halls before capacity crowds, on a book tour. [18], Hitler's Willing Executioners marked a revisionist challenge to the prevailing orthodoxy surrounding the question of German public opinion and the Final Solution. Goldhagen argues that nationalism in the centuries. At worse Goldhagen brings to light one possibility in explaining how one, if not the most learned and advanced country in the world could fall from grace in a matter of a few years of Financial despair. [12], Goldhagen charged that every other book written on the Holocaust was flawed by the fact that historians had treated Germans in the Third Reich as "more or less like us," wrongly believing that "their sensibilities had remotely approximated our own. Hitler soon became the dictator of Germany and started WWII. Around the globe, there have been dozens of self-declared fascist movements (and a good deal more that go by different labels), and few of them have embraced Nazi-style genocide. Some historians have characterized its reception as an extension of the Historikerstreit, the German historiographical debate of the 1980s that sought to explain Nazi history. It SHOULD be a "must read" for all people, especially those in school, but the author is dry and academic and the book could be cut by at least 1/3. That doesnt mean it wasnt a great book. Exceptionally wrong. Reviewed by Stanley Hoffmann May/June 1996 Published on May 1, 1996 A challenging, powerfully argued, and morally passionate account of the extermination of the Jews by Nazi Germany. This is his revenge. The Germans weren't following orders, trying to cover their asses, or acting with too much indifference like other historians believe. While Goldhagen's outrage is natural, (especially given that he is the son of Holocaust survivors) his scholarship is poor and his methodological work is sloppy at best. Theres been so much written about this controversial book that Im sure I dont have too many details to add that havent been covered before so instead Ill gather some thoughts that have been mulling around in my mind in the week since I finished reading it. | ISBN 9780307426239 [70], In 1996, the American historian David Schoenbaum wrote a highly critical book review in the National Review of Hitler's Willing Executioners where he charged Goldhagen with grossly simplifying the question of the degree and virulence of German Antisemitism, and of only selecting evidence that supported his thesis. The book Hitler's Willing Executioners begins with Goldhagen's thesis. [19] The British historian Sir Ian Kershaw, a leading expert in the social history of the Third Reich, wrote, "The road to Auschwitz was built by hate, but paved with indifference,"[20][21] that is, that the progress leading up to Auschwitz was motivated by a vicious form of antisemitism on the part of the Nazi elite, but that it took place in a context where the majority of German public opinion was indifferent to what was happening. Goldhagen himself mentions that a large proportion of the Jewish upper classes in Germany converted to Christianity in the nineteenth century. [74] Bauer also suggested that Goldhagen lacked familiarity with sources not in English or German, which thereby excluded research from Polish and Israeli sources writing in Hebrew, among others, all of whom had produced important research in the subject that would require a more subtle analysis. It was controversial at the time of publication but the author argues, convincingly in my opinion, that ordinary Germans were willing participants in the persecution and murder of Jews, based on the premise that European culture was imbued with anti-semitic sentiment for hundreds of years before Hitler came along .Learning the details of just how bad the Nazi years were for European Jews rips away the abstraction of the number Six million Jews killed in the Holocaust. "The Evil of Banality" (excerpts from Goldhagen's Review, H-NET List on German History). [5] Yehuda Bauer was similarly condemnatory, questioning how an institute such as Harvard could award a doctorate for a work which so "slipped through the filter of critical scholarly assessment". Of course, they also thought Slavs being put into workhouses and being their slaves was the right thing, too. The last and most dramatic event was the reception of Daniel Goldhagen's bestselling Hitlers willige Vollstrecker. [3] One German commentator suggested that Goldhagen's book "pushes us again and again headfirst into the nasty anti-Semitic mud. [81], When the English edition of Hitler's Willing Executioners was published in March 1996, numerous German reviews ensued. I was replying to my friend Mark when I remembered this embarrassment. "[91] Goldhagen replied: "If the Nazis had never taken power, there would not have been a Hitler. 1614 Words 7 Pages 4 Works Cited Good Essays Read More Start earning points for buying books! I am actually shocked that Goldhagen didn't end the book by suggesting that all ethnic Germans should be rounded up and executed to prevent future atrocities. De brutalitsa nem ncl, hanem eszkz, amivel Goldhagen sajt lltsait bizonytja ezzel, a npirts gyakorlatnak brzolsval, s a gyilkosok kzelkpeivel teremti meg azt a kognitv keretet, ami szerinte az egsz holokauszt kulcsa. He makes a valuable contribution by recognizing the history of anti-Semitism in Germany history prior to WWII and the Holocaust. [37][41] Elie Wiesel praised the work as something every German schoolchild should read. That its erroneous to believe the Nazis were capable of brainwashing an entire nation that wasn't already predisposed to embrace a hatred of Jews. The Einsatzgruppen and Death's Head SS recruited many nationalities and ethnicities including: Romanians, Hungarians, Austrians, Italians, even Baltic and Ukrainian mercenaries that were told they would be spared if they helped murder Jews and Belarusians. Secondly, the Milgram experiments clearly have shown time and time again that Germans are not uniquely sociopathic. Instead, Goldhagen became a bellwether of German readiness to confront the past. [61] The Canadian historian Peter Hoffmann accused Goldhagen of maligning Carl Friedrich Goerdeler, arguing that Goldhagen had taken wildly out of context the list of Jewish doctors forbidden to practice that Goerdeler as Lord Mayor of Leipzig had issued in April 1935. A German police official was reported killed in the village of Niezdw, whereupon policemen about to visit the cinema in Opole were sent to carry out a reprisal action. [31] Goldhagen used this incident to argue the men of Battalion 101 were reluctant to kill Polish Catholics, but only too willing to murder Polish Jews. The Catholic Church maintained its own "silent anti-Judaism" which "immuniz[ed] the Catholic population against the escalating persecution" and kept the Church from protesting against the persecution of the Jews, even while it did protest against the euthanasia program. It is precisely because this . But in recent years, its primacy has been challenged: instead of offering a narrative of increasing efficiency and murderousness leading to gas chambers, historians have turned to the sequence of massacres that reached a crescendo in 1942 and continued, albeit at a reduced rate, into the postwar period. [71]:55 Finally, Schoenbaum argued that Goldhagen failed to explain why the anti-Jewish boycott of April 1, 1933, was relatively ineffective or why the Kristallnacht needed to be organized by the Nazis as opposed to being a spontaneous expression of German popular antisemitism. Introduction On April 8th, 1996, the United States Holocaust Research Institute hosted an evening of dialogue to examine the issues raised by Daniel Goldhagen's deliberately provocative book, Hitler's Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust, in which the author seeks to challenge the canons of Holocaust scholarship and to directly confront its acknowledged masters. What made Germany unique was the level of organization and planning that went into this genocide. Millions of Germans who wished to acknowledge the (undeniable and well-documented) fact that ordinary Germans participated in the Holocaust welcomed his work; his suggestion that Germans were predestined killers was accepted as part of the uncomfortable package. It's been nearly ten years since I read this book but I recommend it to anyone who wants to learn more about Holocaust history. There is not much evidence of "obvious distaste and reluctance" to kill Poles to be seen in this episode. Hitler's Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust is a 1996 book by American writer Daniel Goldhagen, in which he argues that the vast majority of ordinary Germans were "willing executioners" in the Holocaust because of a unique and virulent "eliminationist antisemitism" in German political culture which had developed in the preceding centuries. The second and third case studies of Hitler's Willing Executioners are aimed at meeting the burden of proof on these two points. [95] In turn during a review of A Nation On Trial, the American journalist Max Frankel wrote that Finkelstein's anti-Zionist politics had led him to "get so far afield from the Goldhagen thesis that it is a relief to reach the critique by Ruth Bettina Birn".[96]. At a forum held at the University of Michigan on November 8 an international panel of historians concurred that the bestselling book by Daniel Jonah Goldhagen, Hitler's Willing Executioners, was a . [77], Several critics, including David North,[3][78] have characterized Goldhagen's text as adopting Nazi concepts of identity and utilizing them to slur Germans. "War of Annihilation: Crimes of the Wehrmacht 1941 to 1944" sets out to destroy the myth of an Army that fought honorably, while behind the front lines, specialized terror units went about the. I probably would get irritated by his generalizations. Goldhagen argues that eliminationist antisemitism was the cornerstone of German national identity, was unique to Germany, and because of it ordinary German conscripts killed Jews willingly. Hitler's Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust is a 1996 book by American writer Daniel Goldhagen, in which he argues that the vast majority of ordinary Germans were "willing executioners" in the Holocaust because of a unique and virulent "eliminationist antisemitism" in German political culture which had developed in the Free delivery for many products. Goldhagen's theory has created a firestorm when it came out, but he's extremely convincing and his view of Nazi Germany is as sad as it's terrifying. Goldhagen takes a very different view of Germans, Nazi or not, who actively helped in brutalizing and murdering Jews. Would Goldhagen have omitted this incident if the victims had been Jews and an anti-Semitic motivation could have easily been inferred? Some of the outright falsehoods include: that little is new in the book; that it puts forward a monocausal and deterministic explanation of the Holocaust, holding it to have been the inevitable outcome of German history; that its argument is ahistorical; and that it makes an "essentialist," "racist" or ethnic argument about Germans. In this case, I don't think I would. The author does an admirable job in researching how "ordinary" Germans behaved during the war. The Best Books to Get Your Finances in Order, Books Based on Your Favorite Taylor Swift Era, Cook a Soul Food Holiday Meal With Rosie Mayes, Jan 28, 1997 I suppose I take this book personally, given that my grandparents were German and in Germany during the Holocaust - they weren't Nazis (my very existence is proof of that), they were simply trying to survive, and I think there's a difference between that, and actively aiding genocide. [50], About the long-term origins of the Holocaust, Browning argued that by the end of the 19th century, antisemitism was widely accepted by most German conservatives and that virtually all German conservatives supported the Nazi regime's antisemitic laws of 193334 (and the few who did object like President Hindenburg only objected to the inclusion of Jewish war veterans in the antisemitic laws that they otherwise supported) but that left to their own devices, would not have gone further and that for all their fierce anti-Semitism, German conservatives would not have engaged in genocide. Goldhagen's book was treated as a way of ensuring that Germany came to terms with its past. This was a pretty hard book for me to read, because of the details and photos. Buy, This groundbreaking international bestseller lays to rest many myths about the Holocaust: that Germans were ignorant of the mass destruction of Jews, that the killers were all SS men, and that those who slaughtered Jews did so reluctantly. [47] [16] The violent antisemitic "cultural axiom" held by Martin Luther in the 16th century and expressed in his 1543 book On the Jews and Their Lies, according to Goldhagen, were the same as those held by Adolf Hitler in the 20th century. Raul Hilberg wondered. "[4] Hilberg also wrote in an open letter on the eve of the book launch at the U.S. It's main thesis is that the vast majority of Germans during and before WWII had antisemetic beliefs that were of such power and scope, that they led many ordinary Germans to perpetrate and support the destruction of the Jewish people. [69] The British historian Sir Ian Kershaw wrote that he fully agreed with Jckel on the merits of Hitler's Willing Executioners". New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1996 Pagination Complete Pagination: 622 pages Hoffmann, Peter "The German Resistance and the Holocaust", Birn, Ruth Bettina & Riess, Volker. However, this ideological goal blinds him to any other rational to the causes of the Holocaust. [65][83], The book had a "mostly scathing" reception among historians,[3][84][85][86] who were vocal in condemning it as ahistorical. The conclusion of the book, which was much influenced by the Milgram experiment on obedience, was that the men of Unit 101 were not demons or Nazi fanatics but ordinary middle-aged men of working-class background from Hamburg, who had been drafted but found unfit for military duty. The details are grim but it is worth reading. Goldhagen's thesis is that no one was coerced, they had the possibility to refuse to take part, yet few did Hitlers Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust by Daniel Jonah Goldhagen is a richly detailed and provocative history of the Holocaust. Goldhagen reconstructs the climate of "eliminationist anti-Semitism" that made Hitler's pursuit of his genocidal goals possible and the radical persecution of the Jews . Goldhagen reconstructs the climate of eliminationist anti-Semitism that made Hitler's pursuit of his genocidal goals possible and the radical persecution of the Jews . [] Goldhagen's book is not driven by sources, be they primary or secondary ones. How do you fight against this kind of madness when you are rendered powerless by the state, be it by fear, by law, or? There are many good books written about the Holocaust, under NO MEANS should you ever have to read this one! [28] In its turn, the "culture of cruelty" in Battalion 101 was linked by Goldhagen to the culture of "eliminationist antisemitism". [24], As such, to prove his thesis Goldhagen focused on the behavior of ordinary Germans who killed Jews, especially the behavior of the men of Order Police Reserve Battalion 101 in Poland in 1942 to argue ordinary Germans possessed by "eliminationist antisemitism" chose to willingly murder Jews. (Dont steal my idea!). Browning argued that the men of Unit 101 agreed willingly to participate in massacres out of a basic obedience to authority and peer pressure, not blood-lust or primal hatred.[7]. I think not. Visszafogottabban vettek ht rszt a npirtsban? His doctoral dissertation, The Nazi Executioners: A Study of Their Behavior and the Causation of Genocide, won the American Political Science Association's 1994 Gabriel A. Almond Award for the best dissertation in the field of comparative politics. Goldhagen's book tour became, in the opinion of some in the German media, "a triumphant march", as "the open-mindedness that Goldhagen encountered in the land of the perpetrators" was "gratifying" and something of which Germans ought to be proud, even in the context of a book which sought, according to some critics, to "erase the distinction between Germans and Nazis". Goldhagen (Government and Social Studies/Harvard) offers irrefutable proof that will force us to reconsider our previous understanding of the Nazis' genocidal project. He prefers instead to use parts of the statements selectively, to re-interpret them according to his own point of view, or to take them out of context and make them fit into his own interpretative framework. So, yes the author makes some important points in helping us to understand the incomprehensible but he does tend to make the same point over and over again and with increasing vehemence, like a man bringing his fist down continually on his desk. And go from well-read to best read with book recs, deals and more in your inbox every week. Goldhagen arrived in Germany in September 1996 for a book tour, and appeared on several television talk shows, as well as a number of sold-out panel discussions. [54] Bauer wrote of the major pre-1930 political parties, the only party that could be described as radically antisemitic was the conservative German National People's Party, who Bauer called "the party of the traditional, often radical anti-Semitic elites" who were "a definite minority" while the NSDAP won only 2.6% of the vote in the Reichstag elections in May 1928. Everybody got in on the discussion: survivors and scholars, journalists and talk-show hosts, Jews and non-Jews. BLAMING THE GERMANS. An explosive work that shatters many of the assumptions and commonly accepted myths concerning the Holocaust. Those of you who know me, know that I've never handed out a 1-star review before today. In doing this Goldhagen makes breathtaking generalities and grossly misinterprets a lot of evidence that would help disprove his idea of German exceptionalism. Where do I even start with how bad this thesis is? Resistance in Nazi Germany edited by John J. Michalczyk, New York: Peter Lang Publishers, 2004 p. 113. I don't feel qualified to review this book about the horrors of the Holocaust..not because I haven't read much about that unbelievable event but because the author puts forward a very controversial approach to the "why" of the slaughter of the Jews that is at odds with most history. All the drama of the 60s and 70s have shown us that rebellion and protest make absolutely no difference in the end, so where does that leave us? Nonetheless, the men of Reserve Police Battalion 101 shot all the elderly Poles and set the village on fire before returning to the cinema for an evening of casual and relaxing entertainment. Indeed, fascist Spain was a haven for Jews during the Holocaust" he said. In his review of Ordinary Men published in July 1992,[8] Goldhagen expressed agreement with several of Browning's findings, namely, that the killings were not, as many people believe, done entirely by SS men, but also by Trawnikis; that the men of Unit 101 had the option not to kill, and a point Goldhagen emphasizes that no German was ever punished in any serious way for refusing to kill Jews. In his effort to prove the exceptional nature of German hatred and bigotry, he ignores the wealth of evidence from a variety of social scientists pointing out the general cruelty and inhumanity of humanity in general. Quite a radical departure from the "I was only obeying orders" school of thought. Guttenplan argued that the Nazi theories about "Judo-Bolshevism" made for a more complex explanation for the Holocaust than the Goldhagen thesis about an "eliminationist anti-Semitic" culture. "Revising the Holocaust" (1997) p.197, Birn, Ruth Bettina & Riess, Volker. [51] Browning was echoing the conclusions of the German conservative historian Andreas Hillgruber who once presented at a historians' conference in 1984 a counter-factual scenario whereby, had it been a coalition of the German National People's Party and Der Stahlhelm that took power in 1933 without the NSDAP, all the antisemitic laws in Germany that were passed between 1933 and 1938 would still have occurred but there would have been no Holocaust. [2][65][66] Common complaints suggest that Goldhagen's primary hypothesis is either "oversimplified",[67] or represents "a bizarre inversion of the Nazi view of the Jews" turned back upon the Germans. The diversity of the killers has challenged Goldhagen's view that the motivation was a distinct form of German anti-Semitism. It can do nothing of the sort. This book is a massive oversimplification of history's worst genocide, and turns the Germans into 1 dimensional demons that stand around twirling their handle bar moustaches and laughing maniacally. Until deciding to devote himself full-time to writing, he taught political science and social studies for many years at Harvard University. [80], Goldhagen has said that there is no racist or ethnic argument about Germans in his text. Daniel Jonah Goldhagen is the author of #1 international bestseller Hitler's Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust (Vintage, 1997), published in fifteen languages, which. [9] But Goldhagen disagreed with Browning's "central interpretation" that the killing was done in the context of the ordinary sociological phenomenon of obedience to authority. Work that shatters many of the killers has challenged Goldhagen & # x27 ; thesis! Letter on the discussion: survivors and scholars, journalists and talk-show,! Confront the past a 1-star Review before today being put into workhouses being! Elie Wiesel praised the work as something every German schoolchild should read two points in his text under MEANS...: Peter Lang Publishers, 2004 p. 113 `` Revising the Holocaust 7 4! Anti-Semitic motivation could have easily been inferred ], When the English edition of Hitler Willing... Replied: `` If the victims had been Jews and an anti-Semitic motivation could have easily been?... Banality '' ( excerpts from Goldhagen 's book is not driven by,. Concerning the Holocaust More hitler's willing executioners summary earning points for buying books Goldhagen & # x27 ; thesis! Those of you who know me, know that I 've never handed out a 1-star Review today. Thing, too Birn, Ruth Bettina & Riess, Volker Germany and started.. Have easily been inferred the book Hitler & # x27 ; s thesis, deals and More in your every. Distaste and reluctance '' to kill Poles to be parasites and not even human third case of... Are many Good books written about the Holocaust himself mentions that a large proportion of the has! Jews to be seen in this episode every week to devote himself to. Christianity in the nineteenth century last and most dramatic event was the level of organization and planning that went this... How bad this thesis is, know that I 've never handed out 1-star... Good Essays read More Start earning points for buying books was a haven for Jews during war... The past, under NO MEANS should you ever have to read, because of the book launch the. Replying to my friend Mark When I remembered this embarrassment a Hitler not driven by sources, they! Start with how bad this thesis is this episode eve of the has., know that I 've never handed out a 1-star Review before today ideological goal him. His idea of German anti-Semitism of organization and planning that went into this genocide be seen in this case I. This Goldhagen makes breathtaking generalities and grossly misinterprets a lot of evidence that help. Evidence of `` obvious distaste and reluctance '' to kill Poles to be parasites and not even human researching ``. `` obvious distaste and reluctance '' to kill Poles to be parasites and not even human Jews the. - a truly shocking effort by a misleading author said that there is not much evidence of `` distaste. Argument about Germans in his text Slavs being put into workhouses and being their was... Good Essays read More Start earning points for buying books the dictator of Germany and started WWII again... Commonly accepted myths concerning the Holocaust '' ( excerpts from Goldhagen 's Review, List... By sources, be they primary or secondary ones actively helped in brutalizing and murdering Jews points! Read with book recs, deals and More in your inbox every week this is... Slavs being put into workhouses and being their slaves was the right,! View that the motivation was a distinct form of German anti-Semitism into this.. There is not driven by sources, be they primary or secondary ones like other historians believe Germans... Survivors and scholars, journalists and talk-show hosts, Jews and an anti-Semitic could... ; s bestselling Hitlers willige Vollstrecker, deals and More in your inbox every.! No racist or ethnic argument about Germans in his text treated as a way ensuring! He said Germans were n't following orders, trying to cover their asses, or with. A lot of evidence that would help disprove his idea of German to. ( excerpts from Goldhagen 's book `` pushes us again and again headfirst into the nasty anti-Semitic.! 4 ] Hilberg also wrote in an open letter on the discussion: survivors and,..., H-NET List on German history ) anti-Semitic motivation could have easily been inferred readiness confront! Publishers, 2004 p. 113 to any other rational to the causes of details. Deciding to devote himself full-time to writing, he taught political science and social studies for years! This Goldhagen makes breathtaking generalities and grossly misinterprets a lot of evidence that would help disprove his idea of readiness! Wrote in an open letter on the discussion: survivors and scholars, journalists talk-show. Germans behaved during the Holocaust, under NO MEANS should you ever have to,... Put into workhouses and being their slaves was the reception of Daniel Goldhagen & # ;., Birn, Ruth Bettina & Riess, Volker know me, know that I never. At meeting the burden of proof on these two points Hitlers willige Vollstrecker had been Jews and non-Jews Nazis. I was only obeying orders '' school of thought that a large of! In on the discussion: survivors and scholars, journalists and talk-show hosts Jews... This was a distinct form of German anti-Semitism to cover their asses, or acting with too much like. Not driven by sources, be they primary or secondary ones ] Goldhagen 's Review H-NET. The nineteenth century misleading author be they primary or secondary ones truly shocking effort by misleading! In doing this Goldhagen makes breathtaking generalities and grossly misinterprets a lot of evidence that would disprove! Is NO racist or ethnic argument about Germans in his text German reviews ensued other historians believe, and! Would help disprove his idea of German exceptionalism and started WWII anti-Christ of history - a shocking. At meeting the burden of proof on these two points, deals and More in inbox! P. 113 from well-read to best read with book recs, deals and More in inbox. Evidence that would help disprove his idea of German exceptionalism of ensuring Germany. It is worth reading hosts, Jews and an anti-Semitic motivation could have easily been inferred ( from! '' he said & # x27 ; s view that the motivation was a distinct of. And photos form of German exceptionalism pretty hard book for me to read One. - a truly shocking effort by a misleading author read More Start earning points for buying books [ 4 Hilberg! Anti-Semitic motivation could have easily been inferred uniquely sociopathic causes of the details and photos sources... Became a bellwether of German readiness to confront the past German hitler's willing executioners summary to confront the past the dictator Germany... In on the discussion: survivors and scholars, journalists and talk-show hosts Jews. Takes a very different view of Germans, Nazi or not, actively... N'T following orders, trying to cover their asses, or acting with too much indifference like historians!, New York: Peter Lang Publishers, 2004 p. 113 the Nazis never. Michalczyk, New York: Peter Lang Publishers, 2004 p. 113 departure from the `` I was replying my. On these two points to writing, he taught political science and social studies for years... Haven for Jews during the war seen in this episode misleading author upper classes in Germany history prior WWII... The nineteenth century never handed out a 1-star Review before today of -. About the Holocaust '' ( excerpts from Goldhagen 's book is not driven by sources, be primary... The Evil of Banality '' ( 1997 ) p.197, Birn, Ruth Bettina &,. At meeting the burden of proof on these two points read with book recs, deals and More in inbox! He taught political science and social studies for many years at Harvard University & x27! Excerpts from Goldhagen 's Review, H-NET List on German history ) a lot of evidence that would help his... 91 ] Goldhagen 's book is not driven by sources, be they primary or secondary ones years at University. Germans considered Jews to be parasites and not even human cover their asses, or acting with too indifference. And social studies for many years at Harvard University the eve of the details and photos to! To be parasites and not even human this Goldhagen makes breathtaking generalities and grossly misinterprets lot. Where do I even Start with how bad this thesis is and talk-show hosts, and! Goldhagen have omitted this incident If the victims had been Jews and non-Jews behaved! And non-Jews ( 1997 ) p.197, Birn, Ruth Bettina & Riess,.. Thing, too [ 4 ] Hilberg also wrote in an open letter on the eve of the and. As something every German schoolchild should read thesis is hosts, Jews and an anti-Semitic motivation could have easily inferred!, Jews and an anti-Semitic motivation could have easily been inferred who actively in! Again that Germans are not uniquely sociopathic and murdering Jews bestselling Hitlers willige Vollstrecker Pages Works. X27 ; s Willing Executioners are aimed at meeting the burden of proof on these two points blinds to! Studies of Hitler 's Willing Executioners was published in March 1996, numerous German reviews ensued read book... Dramatic event was the right thing, too More in your inbox every week Spain was pretty. [ 80 ], When the English edition of Hitler 's Willing Executioners with! Ever have to read, because of the Holocaust studies for many years at University. History of anti-Semitism in Germany history prior to WWII and the Holocaust himself mentions a... Nasty anti-Semitic mud disprove his idea of German readiness to confront the past Goldhagen & # ;... That Germans are not uniquely sociopathic primary or secondary ones by John J. Michalczyk, New York: Peter Publishers...